Discussing "Deadbeat Dams" as Klamath Plan Moves Forward
CWS Director Andrew Rypel provides valuable perspectives on California’s aging dams & highlights strategic paths that can shape the future of dam infrastructure.
Center for Watershed Sciences researchers continue to emphasize the need for California to reevaluate its dam management practices. By adopting a more thorough assessment of California’s existing dams, California would be prioritizing the safety of its residents, improving the economy, and better serving the environment.
“California’s dams are aging and many will require expensive reconstruction or rehabilitation. Many dams were built for landscapes, climates, and economic purposes that no longer exist. California’s current dams reflect an accumulation of decisions over the past 170 years based on environmental, political, and socio-economic dynamics that have changed, sometimes radically.” – Rypel et al. 2020, What’s the problem with deadbeat dams?
During a recent discussion with the Institute of the Environment, Andrew Rypel, Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences and co-author of the original post, highlighted the continued significance of “deadbeat dams”. Including:
- Why should people be concerned with "deadbeat dams" in California?
- How could a California Dams Blue Ribbon Committee help people in the state?
- What are structured assessment tools, and how can they help solve issues surrounding deadbeat dams?
- How can progress be made in simplifying the complex legal issues surrounding dam removal?
- What is the potential for reservoirs to serve as novel habitat for declining fishes?
Read the discussion: Discussing “Deadbeat Dams” as Klamath Plan Moves Forward. Institute of the Environment. 2023.
Read the original post: What’s the dam problem with deadbeat dams? by Andrew Rypel, Christine Parisek, Jay Lund, Ann Willis, Peter Moyle, Sarah Yarnell, Karrigan Börk. 2020.